Monday, 25 March 2013
Investing in FD's is a losing long term proposition | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ajit Dayal discusses why investing in Fixed Deposits is not as attractive as investing in stock markets. With the equity markets in the "doldrums", there have been a series of articles in the popular press about how investing in Fixed Deposits and in bank accounts is far superior to investing in stock markets. As for gold, it is seen as some barbaric relic that only fools would throw their money at. These arguments are flawed and distort the facts. Readers of the Honest Truth are familiar with the table that is there at the end of every Honest Truth. Suggested allocation in Quantum Mutual Funds (after keeping safe money aside)
Based on Table 1, it is obvious that investors should have exposure to various asset classes. The percentage allocated to each asset class may vary depending on the individual situation of the investors. At the end of the day any investment we make is for:
Shilpa's choice But all of us have a "consumption basket" - we all consume things and, as long as we live, will increasingly consume things. The price we pay for our consumption basket is likely to increase over time - the effects of inflation. Let's take the example of Shilpa, a typical consumer and see how thecost of her consumption basket has changed over time (Table 2). The start year is assumed as 1990. That is just before the Great Indian Reforms of in 1991 when most services or products were provided by either government monopolies or by a few licensed private sector cartels.
Fully aware the costs of enjoying her consumption basket over time will increase; Shilpa knew she had to invest her savings. For arguments sake let's assume that Shilpa had 3 extreme choices:
As Table 3 indicates, the annual cost of her consumption basket in 2011 is Rs 263,000 v/s Rs 42,194 in 1990 - that is an increase of 613% in 21 years, an average price increase of 9% per year over the past 21 years. If Shilpa could use gold to pay for her consumption, she would have needed 200 grammes of gold in 1990. To maintain her "consumption basket" in 2011 she would need only 112 grammes of gold. This is so because the price of gold has surged by 1,098% over that same 21 year time period - an average rate of return of 12% per year for the past 21 years. This is higher than the increase of 9% in the prices of the items in Shilpa's consumption basket. If Shilpa could pay for her consumption with units of "BSE 30 Index" then she would have needed 46 baskets of the BSE-30 Index in 1990. To maintain her "consumption basket" in 2011, she would need only 15 baskets of the BSE-30 Index. This is because the BSE-30 Index has surged by 1,888% over that same 21 year time period - an average rate of return of 15% per year for the past 21 years. This is higher than the increase of 9% in the prices of the items in Shilpa's consumption basket. If Shilpa could pay for her consumption with units of Fixed Deposits or "FDs" then she would have needed 40 baskets of the FDs in 1990. To maintain her "consumption basket" in 2011, she would need a larger number of 70 baskets of the FDs. This is because, while the FDs may have given an average return of 6% after tax, they are below the nearly 9% increase in the prices of goods that Shilpa consumes. This is lower than the increase of 9% in the prices of the items in Shilpa's consumption basket. Note the risks But before you go rushing to buy equity shares or gold, note that both these asset classes can be in the dumps for a long period of time. Or, conversely, can also be "at peaks" for a short period of time. Changes in tax laws will also influence where people could save. If investing in FD's was to become tax free, then maybe Indians like Shilpa would see the benefit of investing in them. Similarly, gold may now attract an import tax and a wealth tax. Shilpa's consumption basket could change. But the biggest risk is, in my opinion, is not diversifying the surplus savings we have into a range of instruments that can give you a steady, decent return and an opportunity to live through some tough times. Disclaimer: The Honest Truth is authored by Ajit Dayal. |
CONSUMER BASKET | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2011 |
TOTAL SPENDING PER ANNUM | 42,914 | 118,500 | 222,250 | 263,000 |
Price of gold, INR/10 grammes | 2,145 | 4,012 | 17,940 | 23,544 |
Units ( Grams) of gold to consume my basket | 200 | 295 | 124 | 112 |
BSE SENSEX | 942 | 4,606 | 18,207 | 17,778 |
Unitsof BSE-30 Index to consume my basket | 46 | 26 | 12 | 15 |
Fixed Deposit Basket Index Value (Value of initial investment Jan 1, 1990 =1000) (SBI 1 Year Deposit Rate)* | 1,064 | 2,220 | 3,550 | 3,769 |
Unitsof FD Basket to consume my basket | 40 | 53 | 63 | 70 |
However, is this right strategy to have? Certainly not if one is confident that
the current growth rate in India is just an aberration and days of higher growth
rate of 7%-8% are only a matter of time. In that case, there could be no better
to time to invest in Indian stocks than now we believe.
And our belief stems from a study that we have carried out based on historical data. You see, since the year 1992-93, there have been only six financial years (excluding FY13) where the economy has grown below 6%. And investments made during the end of these years have on average yielded returns of 19% over the next 12 months. Even from a three year perspective, returns have averaged in the region of 17%. Thus, as can be seen, a weak economy is not the time to avoid stocks. In fact, investments made at such times are likely to yield the best results over the medium to long term as most stocks are priced poorly given the weak economic environment. Therefore, smart investors who are able to take advantage of this opportunity are the ones that end up creating good deal of wealth for themselves.
Consequently, one's best chance at generating returns does not lie in heeding Mr Feldstein's advice. It instead lies in taking an exposure in Indian equities if one is confident of its long term growth story.
And our belief stems from a study that we have carried out based on historical data. You see, since the year 1992-93, there have been only six financial years (excluding FY13) where the economy has grown below 6%. And investments made during the end of these years have on average yielded returns of 19% over the next 12 months. Even from a three year perspective, returns have averaged in the region of 17%. Thus, as can be seen, a weak economy is not the time to avoid stocks. In fact, investments made at such times are likely to yield the best results over the medium to long term as most stocks are priced poorly given the weak economic environment. Therefore, smart investors who are able to take advantage of this opportunity are the ones that end up creating good deal of wealth for themselves.
Consequently, one's best chance at generating returns does not lie in heeding Mr Feldstein's advice. It instead lies in taking an exposure in Indian equities if one is confident of its long term growth story.
CONSUMER BASKET | 1990* | 2000 | 2010 | 2011 |
Food and personal care (Grocery bill) | 10,167 | 20,000 | 37,500 | 42,500 |
Taxis / Trains / Local air travel | 3,696 | 8,750 | 11,250 | 15,000 |
Clothes, shoes | 964 | 2,500 | 3,750 | 4,250 |
Going out (Recreation and Cultural activities) | 402 | 1,250 | 4,500 | 6,250 |
Rent / Accommodation cost | 10,000 | 40,000 | 70,000 | 80,000 |
Electricity | 2,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 | 9,000 |
Telephone / Mobile phone bills | 3,500 | 6,500 | 9,000 | 10,000 |
Medical expenses | 2,000 | 5,000 | 6,500 | 8,000 |
Education | 500 | 2,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
Electronic items | 880 | 2,500 | 18,750 | 22,500 |
Holidays (Hotels and Restaurants) | 8,805 | 25,000 | 50,000 | 62,500 |
TOTAL SPENDING PER ANNUM | 42,914 | 118,500 | 222,250 | 263,000 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)